“There is an ideological chain of association in the view that climate justice can only be realised by the defeat of oppressive capitalist systems of which Zionism is the ne plus ultra. That approach can be effective for animating the passionate ideals of a young crowd that sees the horrors of Gaza as the defining moral cause of their generation. But it also alienates a wider audience of people who want a Green party that campaigns effectively on the climate…” – Raphael Behr, in The Guardian, “Zack Polanski had the chance to show real leadership. He blew it”, 7 Oct.
Resistance is futile
The Green Party seems to have been on a suicide mission at their conference last week, passing a childish motion declaring that Zionism in all its many shades and forms – rather like Antifa, it’s not an organisation you can belong to – is a racist movement; that Palestine should be returned to the Palestinians, and that party members must adhere to their own, unique definition of antisemitism.
They may have a debatable point, given the disastrous treatment of the resident Palestinian population of Israel over the past seven decades, leading up by degrees to the awful retaliatory massacre of 7 Oct, 2023 – and at least they didn’t raise the unspoken subject of Zionism’s allegedly co-operative relations with the Nazi party in Germany in the 1920s, or its terroristic activities in the late 1940s – but surely the motion would have been considered by the organisers to have a) absolutely no relevance to the party’s general political agenda, which was gaining favour with the public; and b) to have the effect only of goading the rightwing frothers and Netanyahu apologists into a predictable paroxysm of fury, giving the impression that the party is institutionally antisemitic and has been captured by Corbynites.
Why they let it get as far as a show of hands I have no idea, but I’d guess it’s cost them a shedload of voters in the outside world, not least among the moderate Jewish community; while it’s becoming clearer than ever that the leader, Polanski, is an unelectable halfwit with, as my old headmaster, Jerry Cornes, once summed me up: “no leadership skills whatsoever” (he still made me Head Boy!). Haven’t they noticed, he’s standing in a by-election in Starmer’s old Holborn & St Pancras seat this Thursday, and might quite like to win it? (Maybe they have!)
In the meantime, we’ve heard practically nothing from them about confronting Big Energy, which after fifty years of lying about its damaging effects on the climate is about to receive immunity from legal actions for causing environmental disasters, courtesy of the tone-deaf Trumpian corporatists of the US Supreme Court. Plus, of course, there’s another futile COP coming up in methane-belching Turkey next month, threatening to provide a broad platform for energy industry lobbyists to swamp the event and suffocate the world’s net-zero ambitions at birth.
Surely, if you’re genuinely a ‘Green’ party, you’d reserve your acts of heroic resistance for that, and not for pointless performative gestures over a complicated and poorly understood historical issue of zero relevance to the British voter, whose consequences they can do nothing about?
What’s that you say?
“World’s only flying Seafire XV11 returns home. Built in Yeovil in 1946, the Seafire has joined the Navy wings charity collection at RNAS Yevoliton.” (Sic.) From BBC News, photo caption, 04 Oct.
Does no-one check things anymore? Does the board of directors no longer care about standards while hacking away clumsily at the programme schedules to save money? Do they deserve our licence fee? The scrambling of the letters in ‘Yeovilton’ in that sentence is just one egregious* example of why now-extinct subeditors were a necessary breed, as – especially – the BBC’s underpaid caption cretins strike again unchecked.
I have a thing about captions anyway, as nowadays they are rarely left up on screen long enough for pensioners to read all the way through; while having a very large screen – mine’s a 65-incher, how big’s yours, nyah nah? – can mean it takes an extra second or two to even notice that some vital statistical information has popped up on the edge of your age-tunneled field of vision.
Of course, it’s not only the BBC whose caption writing has become annoyingly sloppy; especially in its news ‘crawlers’. The hearing test lady in Specsavers is annually impressed with my ability “at my age” to detect the tiniest batsqueak noises she plays to me in the audio booth. In fact, I deliberately ignore the topmost frequencies as I like to pass tests that prove I’m less than perfect. I’m scored more than halfway up the autism spectrum on the Baron-Cohen test, for instance; which when you come to think of it, probably proves I really am halfway up the autism spectrum for even thinking of trying to cheat the test against myself in the first place, merely to celebrate being a bit, well, odd.
And that digression aside, returning to my theme, even with my impressive Superman-level hearing I cannot understand a word uttered on TV by, in order, the Glaswegian football commentator Ally McCoist, the Liverpudlian podcasting pundit Wayne Rooney, and any American actor you care to name. For which reason, I rely on the probably AI generated subtitles available on the iPlayer, Prime, Netflix and elsewhere. At least, I do until I can no longer bear the illiteracies of the stone-deaf transcribers rendering half the words I can actually manage to make out as absurd homonyms of the actual dialogue being spoken.
The sort of thing I’m thinking of would be the transcription of ‘yesterday’ as ‘yes, today’. ‘Honest’ might come across as ‘harnessed’; ‘pattern’ as ‘platform’. There are so many actual examples, but my 77 year-old brain doesn’t store that kind of information for very long, which, I suppose, makes me as guilty as the subtitlers for failing to process information correctly. I know, I should have made at least a few notes before embarking on this moan. I can only plead distraction – I was trying to make out the next section of dialogue before I lost the plot entirely. But try an episode of Ted Lasso, you’ll get the pitcher.
It’s like having tea with a deaf old aunt.
Surely, even an AI model, seemingly capable of manufacturing endless expressions of empathy with the lonely widow, or improving the standard of Nigerian scam emails and Russian bots so we no longer recognise them as such when we receive them; and has read far more books than I ever did as an English major – later, an editor – must recognise when it is generating gibberish? Sloppy subtitles are a curse on humankind and could conceivably lead to disastrous events unfolding through endless misnomerings and confiscations.
Bring back subeditors!
*Egregious. Yes. As in the sloppy current usage it does not mean bad or unpleasant or criminal, it describes Nigel Farage but only in a limited sense. It derives from the Latin ‘ex-‘, meaning outside, and ‘grex’, meaning a flock, as of sheep. Outside the run of conventional ‘baahaviour’…. It means, essentially, ‘outstanding’, ‘contrary’ or ‘unusual’. Get a grip, wordsters.
GW – blowin’ things up
USA: “Tropical Storm Isaias (ex-Tropical Depression 9) formed early Wednesday in the warm waters off eastern Mexico and forecasters said it was expected to strengthen into the first hurricane of the Atlantic season before hitting the U.S. Gulf Coast later in the week.”The consensus seems to be that it could make landfall between Louisiana and the Florida panhandle, bringing flooding rain once again into Alabama and the southeast. Concerns are being raised for several, apparently important college football games. Coastal residents have been warned to prepare. (MSN reports)
Meanwhile…. a prolonged 100 deg. F heatwave has been affecting the Los Angeles area for the past six days and “the extreme October heat is straining Southern California’s power system as thousands of customers face outages and firefighters battle a wildfire in Los Angeles County.” The Bouquet fire “spread rapidly through the Angeles national forest after starting Saturday, prompting evacuation orders and warnings and threatening structures and power lines”. However… “Temperatures will plummet, rain will pour down and snow will fly this weekend into early next week as a major pattern change directs much colder and even stormier conditions to the western United States.” Temperatures could drop by as much as 50 degrees on Friday. It’s partly due to east Pacific Hurricane Rachel, which is expected to turn towards the California coast, bringing tidal surge and big waves – and partly to a loop in the jetstream. (AccuWeather)
Tailpipe
Cleverclogs
“An IQ score of 1,775 would be remarkable, given that the Guinness World Records holder for highest IQ held a score of 228 before Guinness retired the record in 1990. ” Snopes’ fact-checking website has put to bed a rumour that Trump has been claiming to have an IQ of 1,775. It appears to have been a false impression due to his famous ADHD, when he tried to tell an audience at one of his rallies two things at the same time: that he has a very high IQ, and he was able to persuade the Pentagon to stump up a symbolic $1,776 dollar bonus for serving personnel:
- “I’m a high-IQ person, unlike some other people I can tell you about. Very, the, among the highest IQs anywhere in the world, 1,775. And I said, you know, if we can scrap up $1 more we’ll be at 1,776, and that’s what we did.”
So, I hope that’s cleared it up.
Incidentally, who has an IQ over 200? Professor Stephen Hawking’s was ‘only’ 162. Trump’s has never been directly measured, as the ‘high intelligence’ tests he ‘aces’ are in fact just standard dementia tests, but experts put it fairly low, at 110 or so. Never mistake low cunning for high intelligence.
Speaking of witch, “The US vice-president has dismissed calls for global regulation of AI safety risks, telling companies creating the most advanced models: ‘If you’re building Frankenstein, stop.’” (from The Guardian) Somebody tell the poor booby, Dr ‘Frankenstein’ CREATED the monster, he wasn’t the monster itself, that was Sam Altman, made from spare parts of Donald Trump. Duh.